rec.bicycles.racing
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing?hl=enrec.bicycles.racing@googlegroups.com
Today's topics:
* Rationale behing "Luxembourg" team - ousting Riis ? - 4 messages, 4 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/1030fd2bf5bd7d8f?hl=en
* Even anti-doping people don't want Floyd around - 7 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/f298d8db03d82060?hl=en
* "Hi Betsy, it's Stephanie...." - 7 messages, 7 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/6f0f1e57d0bfa788?hl=en
* Moratorium - 3 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/f67aa46f44c99026?hl=en
* Two different stories from the Vuelta TT - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/7b71a877c8f085d8?hl=en
* W H E A T T H I N S ! ! ! ! ! - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/2d9122e3da26b995?hl=en
* Lance Armstrong, "I don't recall." - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/49144e36d79c0dfc?hl=en
* The Last Word On Cadence And Heart Rate - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/9723c0f0dcb01e5b?hl=en
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Rationale behing "Luxembourg" team - ousting Riis ?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/1030fd2bf5bd7d8f?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 2:25 pm
From: "Kurgan Gringioni"
"Keith" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:oe7a96tm1bv8pr1epm6nf6gaiu47pr3gbt@4ax.com...
: You have to wonder after reading this :
:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/riis-on-cancellara-i-got-the-best-out-of-him?cid=OTC-RSS&attr=news_headlines
:
: Looks like they're trying to get away from him...the question is why ?
: - admitted doper
: - too bossy
: - not paying them enough
: - bald
: - etc...
Dumbass -
It's not the bald thing or the doping thing. Everyone knew about that stuff
before he ever became a DS. It's gotta be something personal. Somehow, he's
alienated everyone. I'll guess ego and narcisissm - they're the most common
afflictors in situations like this.
It's really surprising, given how much success the teams have had.
thanks,
Kurgan. presented by Gringioni.
== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 3:29 pm
From: RicodJour
On Sep 18, 4:16 pm, Keith <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
> You have to wonder after reading this :http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/riis-on-cancellara-i-got-the-best-out...
>
> Looks like they're trying to get away from him...the question is why ?
> - admitted doper
> - too bossy
> - not paying them enough
> - bald
> - etc...
I'm not so interested in the reason for the parting of ways - there
are always a myriad of factors, personality not being the least - so
much as Riis' he-didn't-hurt-me-at-ALL,-bro! comments. What exactly
is he saying with that comment about getting a sponsor? If you have
Cancellara and the Schleck brothers on the team it's not exactly going
to be a stretch to get people interested. And the "I got the best out
of him" is a barely concealed "I gave her the best years of my life."
It's pitiful. I'm wondering which RBR empathic giant will step up and
counsel him through his grief...
R
== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 5:46 pm
From: Magilla Gorilla
Keith wrote:
> You have to wonder after reading this :
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/riis-on-cancellara-i-got-the-best-out-of-him?cid=OTC-RSS&attr=news_headlines
>
> Looks like they're trying to get away from him...the question is why ?
> - admitted doper
> - too bossy
> - not paying them enough
> - bald
> - etc...
Riis is right - Cancellera is beyond his prime. His best days are behind him. The Schleck brothers are pencil
dicks doped to the gills. This new Luxembourg team looks like it has Rashaan Bahati in charge of the sponsorship
talks.
Going with a tried and tested doper like Contador whose corrupt Spanish federation makes sure their kingpin doesn't
get popped is an added bonus.
Magilla
== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 6:34 pm
From: "H. Fred Kveck"
In article <i73anv$o23$1@news.eternal-september.org>,
"Kurgan Gringioni" <soulinthemachine@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Keith" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:oe7a96tm1bv8pr1epm6nf6gaiu47pr3gbt@4ax.com...
> : You have to wonder after reading this :
> :
> http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/riis-on-cancellara-i-got-the-best-out-of-him?c
> id=OTC-RSS&attr=news_headlines
> :
> : Looks like they're trying to get away from him...the question is why ?
> : - admitted doper
> : - too bossy
> : - not paying them enough
> : - bald
> : - etc...
> It's not the bald thing or the doping thing. Everyone knew about that stuff
> before he ever became a DS. It's gotta be something personal. Somehow, he's
> alienated everyone. I'll guess ego and narcisissm - they're the most common
> afflictors in situations like this.
>
> It's really surprising, given how much success the teams have had.
It could be the reasons you suggested, or something simpler. The Schlecks had a
team built around them being dangled in front of them, with the bonus that it's from
their own country. It sounds like a "grass is greener" thing to me. And with their
exit and the shakiness of Riis' sponsorship situation, the other riders decide that
it might be time to go along with the Schlecks or go elsewhere.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Even anti-doping people don't want Floyd around
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/f298d8db03d82060?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 7 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 2:28 pm
From: "Kurgan Gringioni"
"Magilla Gorilla" <m.gorilla@sandiegozoo.org> wrote in message
news:4C951680.243AA5B3@sandiegozoo.org...
: Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
:
: > "Magilla Gorilla" <m.gorilla@sandiegozoo.org> wrote in message
: > news:4C94EF01.A219EAB5@sandiegozoo.org...
: > :
: > : Here I am telling you people gems like Pate's wife was banged by TD
and
: > : how Phil Z is on trial before it hits the press...and this is the
thanks
: > : I get?
: > :
: > : I gave you people everything. I taught you the value of money and how
to
: > : make it. I gave you Darian, I gave you people your manhood. And this
is
: > : how you pay me back?
: >
: > Dumbass -
: >
: > Greed is only good only when it is controlled.
: >
: > thanks,
: >
: > Kurgan. presented by Gringioni.
:
: I stopped believing in fortune cookie messages a long time ago. So should
: you.
Dumbass -
I respond to your Wall Street reference with another Wall Street reference
and this is what you give me?
thanks,
Kurgan. presented by Gringioni.
== 2 of 7 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 2:36 pm
From: "Kurgan Gringioni"
"Amit Ghosh" <amit.ghosh@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7add277d-aaa4-41c2-9932-ff57ae03bf14@w4g2000vbh.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 18, 3:16 pm, "Kurgan Gringioni" <soulinthemach...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Cycling goes too far. Two year bans for the first offense. They're making
> it
> into a moral issue rather than treating it as simply a rules infraction.
> By
> making it a moral issue, it brings more attention to it and the negative
> publicity is bad for sponsorship/viewer interest.
>
> Cycling needs to treat it as a mere rules infraction. Doping to gain an
> advantage is no different than an offensive lineman doing some holding to
> gain an advantage in football. Treat it as such and the negative press
> will
> be minimized.
:: it depends on what the issue is. other sports may be soft on doping
:: but they deal harshly with other violations (gambling, coruption, bad
:: bahaviour).
::
:: other pro sports have a "god", a commissioner who can make a decision
:: which is final.
::
:: if david stern wants to suspend an athlete (like he did with ron
:: artest) or fine an owner he does it and there is no CAS appeal etc.
:: etc.
Dumbass -
I don't pay attention to baseball, but the NFL and the NBA have an appeals
process to any ruling by the commissioner. The NFL's appeals process is sort
of a show trial since the appeal is made to the commissioner himself, but
the NBA's is conducted by an independent arbitrator.
thanks,
Kurgan. presented by Gringioni.
== 3 of 7 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 5:37 pm
From: Magilla Gorilla
Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
> "Magilla Gorilla" <m.gorilla@sandiegozoo.org> wrote in message
> news:4C951680.243AA5B3@sandiegozoo.org...
> : Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
> :
> : > "Magilla Gorilla" <m.gorilla@sandiegozoo.org> wrote in message
> : > news:4C94EF01.A219EAB5@sandiegozoo.org...
> : > :
> : > : Here I am telling you people gems like Pate's wife was banged by TD
> and
> : > : how Phil Z is on trial before it hits the press...and this is the
> thanks
> : > : I get?
> : > :
> : > : I gave you people everything. I taught you the value of money and how
> to
> : > : make it. I gave you Darian, I gave you people your manhood. And this
> is
> : > : how you pay me back?
> : >
> : > Dumbass -
> : >
> : > Greed is only good only when it is controlled.
> : >
> : > thanks,
> : >
> : > Kurgan. presented by Gringioni.
> :
> : I stopped believing in fortune cookie messages a long time ago. So should
> : you.
>
> Dumbass -
>
> I respond to your Wall Street reference with another Wall Street reference
> and this is what you give me?
>
> thanks,
>
> Kurgan. presented by Gringioni.
You know, I thought you did that, but I don't recall the reference to
controlling greed so I wasn't quite sure if it was just a coincidence. But in
light of your claim, I will give you credit for the Gekko discovery.
Magilla
== 4 of 7 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 5:41 pm
From: Magilla Gorilla
Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
> "Magilla Gorilla" <m.gorilla@sandiegozoo.org> wrote in message
> news:4C94F0D0.556B21DE@sandiegozoo.org...
> : > :
> : > : Yet everyone thinks it's about prosecuting violators.
> : >
> : > <snip>
> : >
> : > Dumbass -
> : >
> : > The head of any sports governing body has one overriding priority:
> promote
> : > the sport. Better promotion of the sport = more $$$$$.
> : >
> : > Everything they do falls under the umbrella of this raison d'etre.
> : >
> : > thanks,
> : >
> : > Kurgan. presented by Gringioni.
> :
> : That's exactly how a high school graduate thinks. A college graduate,
> : however, is suppose to factor in the REAL long-term costs and consequences
> of
> : covering up a small problem that will only allow it to metastasize and
> take
> : down the entire sport.
> :
> : Well, we are now witnessing it...Fraud and now Pharmstrong. The two
> biggest
> : Americans in the sport are now known as frauds, attacking each other like
> : rabid dogs.
> :
> : Had McQuaid and his doping partner-in-crime Verbruggen cracked down on
> this
> : bullshit as real intelligent leaders would have done, none of this would
> have
> : happened.
>
> Dumbass -
>
> The model for the correct way to handle doping is either FIFA or the NFL.
> Someone fails a test, he gets suspended for a few games, then is allowed
> back with the caveat that subsequent failed tests will result in longer and
> longer suspensions.
>
> Cycling goes too far. Two year bans for the first offense. They're making it
> into a moral issue rather than treating it as simply a rules infraction. By
> making it a moral issue, it brings more attention to it and the negative
> publicity is bad for sponsorship/viewer interest.
>
> Cycling needs to treat it as a mere rules infraction. Doping to gain an
> advantage is no different than an offensive lineman doing some holding to
> gain an advantage in football. Treat it as such and the negative press will
> be minimized.
>
> thanks,
>
> Kurgan. presented by Gringioni.
Football and soccer are not good benchmarks for cycling because doping does not
have a direct outcome on the final score in a football game as much as dopng in
cycling does.
In sports where pure endurance is the difference between winning and losing,
you can't enforce doping in cycling like in ball sports, especially those that
depend on an entire team effort. There are no drugs in football or soccer that
will definitely make a persons core more goals. But in cycling, EPO will
definitely help you win.
Same with track and swimming. Dopers could come along and kick ass unless you
weeded them out.
Magilla
== 5 of 7 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 9:24 pm
From: Fred Fredburger
Magilla Gorilla wrote:
> Football and soccer are not good benchmarks for cycling because doping does not
> have a direct outcome on the final score in a football game as much as dopng in
> cycling does.
You don't honestly think all those 300lb linemen who run the 40 yard
dash in 5 seconds are clean?
== 6 of 7 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 10:13 pm
From: "Kurgan Gringioni"
"Magilla Gorilla" <m.gorilla@sandiegozoo.org> wrote in message
news:4C955B63.AE6F7554@sandiegozoo.org...
: Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
:
: > "Magilla Gorilla" <m.gorilla@sandiegozoo.org> wrote in message
: > news:4C951680.243AA5B3@sandiegozoo.org...
: > : Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
: > :
: > : > "Magilla Gorilla" <m.gorilla@sandiegozoo.org> wrote in message
: > : > news:4C94EF01.A219EAB5@sandiegozoo.org...
: > : > :
: > : > : Here I am telling you people gems like Pate's wife was banged by
TD
: > and
: > : > : how Phil Z is on trial before it hits the press...and this is the
: > thanks
: > : > : I get?
: > : > :
: > : > : I gave you people everything. I taught you the value of money and
how
: > to
: > : > : make it. I gave you Darian, I gave you people your manhood. And
this
: > is
: > : > : how you pay me back?
: > : >
: > : > Dumbass -
: > : >
: > : > Greed is only good only when it is controlled.
: > : >
: > : > thanks,
: > : >
: > : > Kurgan. presented by Gringioni.
: > :
: > : I stopped believing in fortune cookie messages a long time ago. So
should
: > : you.
: >
: > Dumbass -
: >
: > I respond to your Wall Street reference with another Wall Street
reference
: > and this is what you give me?
: >
: > thanks,
: >
: > Kurgan. presented by Gringioni.
:
: You know, I thought you did that, but I don't recall the reference to
: controlling greed so I wasn't quite sure if it was just a coincidence.
Dumbass -
Well, GG said "Greed is Good" and I added onto it.
thanks,
Kurgan. presented by Gringioni.
== 7 of 7 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 10:17 pm
From: "Kurgan Gringioni"
"Fred Fredburger" <I@just.dont.know.anymore> wrote in message
news:4c959099@news.x-privat.org...
: Magilla Gorilla wrote:
:
: > Football and soccer are not good benchmarks for cycling because doping
does not
: > have a direct outcome on the final score in a football game as much as
dopng in
: > cycling does.
:
: You don't honestly think all those 300lb linemen who run the 40 yard
: dash in 5 seconds are clean?
Dumbass -
One of them ran a 4.8 at the Combine last year.
That is in-fucking-credible for someone who weighs 300 lbs.
thanks,
Kurgan. presented by Gringioni.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: "Hi Betsy, it's Stephanie...."
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/6f0f1e57d0bfa788?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 7 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 2:40 pm
From: "Kurgan Gringioni"
"--D-y" <dustoyevsky@mac.com> wrote in message
news:c505d34f-3fda-44c1-8e55-d84020409aa2@k13g2000vbq.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 18, 2:09 pm, Amit Ghosh <amit.gh...@gmail.com> wrote:
:: I think there's a timeframe issue here, also-- referring to a time
:: before Betsy's recent expressions of wonderful heartfelt concern for
:: The Children, when, in spite of whatever "evidence" existed at the
:: time regarding LA's guilt, she came off principally as a vindictive
:: hater of Lance Armstrong.
Dumbass -
If you want to do something for The Children, first thing to do is make
public any deathbed confessions you've heard someone make to their doctor.
thanks,
Kurgan. presented by Gringioni.
== 2 of 7 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 5:26 pm
From: Magilla Gorilla
Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
> "--D-y" <dustoyevsky@mac.com> wrote in message
> news:c505d34f-3fda-44c1-8e55-d84020409aa2@k13g2000vbq.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 18, 2:09 pm, Amit Ghosh <amit.gh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> :: I think there's a timeframe issue here, also-- referring to a time
> :: before Betsy's recent expressions of wonderful heartfelt concern for
> :: The Children, when, in spite of whatever "evidence" existed at the
> :: time regarding LA's guilt, she came off principally as a vindictive
> :: hater of Lance Armstrong.
>
> Dumbass -
>
> If you want to do something for The Children, first thing to do is make
> public any deathbed confessions you've heard someone make to their doctor.
>
> thanks,
>
> Kurgan. presented by Gringioni.
First of all, just because Betsy invoked 'the children' thing in a recent
quote...that doesn't mean it's her total motive. You should never really
read quotes as a total and absolute explanation for anything unless the
person makes that intent clear. She didn't.
Second, Lance wasn't on his 'deathbed.' The guy was never really in danger
of dying. That's part of the whole Lance Armstrong myth to make him out to
be superhuman. Ernie Lechuga had a testicle removed from his satchel and he
didn't die either. Did he cheat death too? Nobody really dies from testicle
cancer. That's right up there with jeff Gordon claiming in divorce papers
that being a NASCAR driver is a really dangerous thing when statistics say
otherwise.
Third, absent Betsy's revelations, the federal case and pending USADA case
would still be going forward as neither will likely focus on pre-96 doping.
SO Betsy, while entertaining, is really a red herring.
Fourth, Lance made the decision to reveal information to people with whom he
had no formal contract to maintain confidentiality. Even if he did, they are
required to tell the truth under subpoena.
Fifth, the people who perjured themselves under oath are committing felonies
because they all have financial motives to lie. Bill Clinton was impeached
because he lied under oath and fined $75,000 by a federal judge. Clinton
was also disbarred. You don't do that shit and then cry about it.
Sixth, Betsy didn't reveal anything personal. The fact that Lance doped and
admitted it in a milieu where he assumed it was confidential, but in reality
wasn't, isn't a compelling argument. If Lance wanted confidentiality he
should have made people sign nondisclosure agreements. Betsy signed on to no
such rider.
Taking steroids actually does kill children and harm many more (especially in
Texas - king of steroid football). So Betsy's argument comes across to me as
more genuine and compelling than a guy who gave himself cancer with steroids
and then claims to the world they should donate to his cancer foundation
because he's such a great role model.
Magilla
== 3 of 7 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 5:37 pm
From: BLafferty
On 9/18/2010 2:05 PM, Magilla Gorilla wrote:
> http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/more_sports/2010/09/18/2010-09-18_abusvie_voicemails_now_part_of_armstrong_probe.html?page=1
>
Partial transcripts. What is missing?
== 4 of 7 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 6:27 pm
From: Carl Sundquist
On Sep 18, 7:26 pm, Magilla Gorilla <m.gori...@sandiegozoo.org> wrote:
> Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
> > "--D-y" <dustoyev...@mac.com> wrote in message
> >news:c505d34f-3fda-44c1-8e55-d84020409aa2@k13g2000vbq.googlegroups.com...
> > On Sep 18, 2:09 pm, Amit Ghosh <amit.gh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > :: I think there's a timeframe issue here, also-- referring to a time
> > :: before Betsy's recent expressions of wonderful heartfelt concern for
> > :: The Children, when, in spite of whatever "evidence" existed at the
> > :: time regarding LA's guilt, she came off principally as a vindictive
> > :: hater of Lance Armstrong.
>
> > Dumbass -
>
> > If you want to do something for The Children, first thing to do is make
> > public any deathbed confessions you've heard someone make to their doctor.
>
> > thanks,
>
> > Kurgan. presented by Gringioni.
>
> First of all, just because Betsy invoked 'the children' thing in a recent
> quote...that doesn't mean it's her total motive. You should never really
> read quotes as a total and absolute explanation for anything unless the
> person makes that intent clear. She didn't.
>
> Second, Lance wasn't on his 'deathbed.' The guy was never really in danger
> of dying. That's part of the whole Lance Armstrong myth to make him out to
> be superhuman. Ernie Lechuga had a testicle removed from his satchel and he
> didn't die either. Did he cheat death too? Nobody really dies from testicle
> cancer. That's right up there with jeff Gordon claiming in divorce papers
> that being a NASCAR driver is a really dangerous thing when statistics say
> otherwise.
>
> Third, absent Betsy's revelations, the federal case and pending USADA case
> would still be going forward as neither will likely focus on pre-96 doping.
> SO Betsy, while entertaining, is really a red herring.
>
> Fourth, Lance made the decision to reveal information to people with whom he
> had no formal contract to maintain confidentiality. Even if he did, they are
> required to tell the truth under subpoena.
>
> Fifth, the people who perjured themselves under oath are committing felonies
> because they all have financial motives to lie. Bill Clinton was impeached
> because he lied under oath and fined $75,000 by a federal judge. Clinton
> was also disbarred. You don't do that shit and then cry about it.
>
> Sixth, Betsy didn't reveal anything personal. The fact that Lance doped and
> admitted it in a milieu where he assumed it was confidential, but in reality
> wasn't, isn't a compelling argument. If Lance wanted confidentiality he
> should have made people sign nondisclosure agreements. Betsy signed on to no
> such rider.
>
> Taking steroids actually does kill children and harm many more (especially in
> Texas - king of steroid football). So Betsy's argument comes across to me as
> more genuine and compelling than a guy who gave himself cancer with steroids
> and then claims to the world they should donate to his cancer foundation
> because he's such a great role model.
>
> Magilla
Dumbass,
Armstrong's testicular cancer metastasized to his lungs and brain.
That's what was life threatening.
== 5 of 7 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 6:49 pm
From: Brad Anders
On Sep 18, 5:26 pm, Magilla Gorilla <m.gori...@sandiegozoo.org> wrote:
> Taking steroids actually does kill children and harm many more (especially in
> Texas - king of steroid football).
I looked, I couldn't find any examples - can you cite just one case
where a child (i.e. under 18) who took steroids to improve athletic
performance died? I don't deny plenty take them and are possibly
harmed, but I haven't heard of a death connected to it.
Brad Anders
== 6 of 7 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 8:09 pm
From: Keith
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010 18:27:58 -0700 (PDT), Carl Sundquist
<carl.sundquist@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Sep 18, 7:26Êpm, Magilla Gorilla <m.gori...@sandiegozoo.org> wrote:
>> Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
>> > "--D-y" <dustoyev...@mac.com> wrote in message
>> >news:c505d34f-3fda-44c1-8e55-d84020409aa2@k13g2000vbq.googlegroups.com...
>> > On Sep 18, 2:09 pm, Amit Ghosh <amit.gh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > :: I think there's a timeframe issue here, also-- referring to a time
>> > :: before Betsy's recent expressions of wonderful heartfelt concern for
>> > :: The Children, when, in spite of whatever "evidence" existed at the
>> > :: time regarding LA's guilt, she came off principally as a vindictive
>> > :: hater of Lance Armstrong.
>>
>> > Dumbass -
>>
>> > If you want to do something for The Children, first thing to do is make
>> > public any deathbed confessions you've heard someone make to their doctor.
>>
>> > thanks,
>>
>> > Kurgan. presented by Gringioni.
>>
>> First of all, just because Betsy invoked 'the children' thing in a recent
>> quote...that doesn't mean it's her total motive. ÊYou should never really
>> read quotes as a total and absolute explanation for anything unless the
>> person makes that intent clear. ÊShe didn't.
>>
>> Second, Lance wasn't on his 'deathbed.' ÊThe guy was never really in danger
>> of dying. ÊThat's part of the whole Lance Armstrong myth to make him out to
>> be superhuman.
>> Magilla
>
>Dumbass,
>
>Armstrong's testicular cancer metastasized to his lungs and brain.
>That's what was life threatening.
And the thing is, you can normally never heal from a metastasized
cancer, that makes him a superhuman, or we don't know the whole
story...
That's what my previous research had turned up and I looked it up
again...http://www.howtostopcancer.com/ :
"The 5-year survival rate for metastasized cancer of any origin is
almost ZERO despite what current medical science has to throw at the
problem. Current medicine does a decent job dealing with localized
cancer, but if it metastasizesÉ.its pretty much Ògame over!"
Wonder why no medical expert has marvelled at Armstrong beating a
metastasized cancer...
I'll start a new thread about that actually.
== 7 of 7 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 9:49 pm
From: Doug Anderson
Keith <nospam@nospam.com> writes:
> On Sat, 18 Sep 2010 18:27:58 -0700 (PDT), Carl Sundquist
> <carl.sundquist@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Sep 18, 7:26Êpm, Magilla Gorilla <m.gori...@sandiegozoo.org> wrote:
> >> Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
> >> > "--D-y" <dustoyev...@mac.com> wrote in message
> >> >news:c505d34f-3fda-44c1-8e55-d84020409aa2@k13g2000vbq.googlegroups.com...
> >> > On Sep 18, 2:09 pm, Amit Ghosh <amit.gh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > :: I think there's a timeframe issue here, also-- referring to a time
> >> > :: before Betsy's recent expressions of wonderful heartfelt concern for
> >> > :: The Children, when, in spite of whatever "evidence" existed at the
> >> > :: time regarding LA's guilt, she came off principally as a vindictive
> >> > :: hater of Lance Armstrong.
> >>
> >> > Dumbass -
> >>
> >> > If you want to do something for The Children, first thing to do is make
> >> > public any deathbed confessions you've heard someone make to their doctor.
> >>
> >> > thanks,
> >>
> >> > Kurgan. presented by Gringioni.
> >>
> >> First of all, just because Betsy invoked 'the children' thing in a recent
> >> quote...that doesn't mean it's her total motive. ÊYou should never really
> >> read quotes as a total and absolute explanation for anything unless the
> >> person makes that intent clear. ÊShe didn't.
> >>
> >> Second, Lance wasn't on his 'deathbed.' ÊThe guy was never really in danger
> >> of dying. ÊThat's part of the whole Lance Armstrong myth to make him out to
> >> be superhuman.
> >> Magilla
> >
> >Dumbass,
> >
> >Armstrong's testicular cancer metastasized to his lungs and brain.
> >That's what was life threatening.
>
> And the thing is, you can normally never heal from a metastasized
> cancer, that makes him a superhuman, or we don't know the whole
> story...
>
> That's what my previous research had turned up and I looked it up
> again...http://www.howtostopcancer.com/ :
>
> "The 5-year survival rate for metastasized cancer of any origin is
> almost ZERO despite what current medical science has to throw at the
> problem. Current medicine does a decent job dealing with localized
> cancer, but if it metastasizesÉ.its pretty much Ògame over!"
You must not have read the website you are using as a source for
knowledge. You are quoting a website that is basically an
advertisment (by someone with no indicated medical training, skill, or
knowledge) who is selling his book.
You realizes that this is the opposite of an authority.
He tells you you can have his protocol absolutely free! Then when you
click on the link, he tells you it's "only $37 for a REAL book."
It comes with a moneyback guarantee (you get your $37 back if you die)?
> Wonder why no medical expert has marvelled at Armstrong beating a
> metastasized cancer...
Because medical experts understand that cancer is complicated (both
before and after metastasis) and that there are many different types
of cancer with many different forms and levels of metastasis upon
discovery and with many different prognoses.
> I'll start a new thread about that actually.
Please don't.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Moratorium
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/f67aa46f44c99026?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 3:05 pm
From: Fred
Not that most of us had any question about this before, but it is
certain now. There shall be no mention of TD as a GT GC contender
ever again. Never. Got it...
Fred
== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 3:16 pm
From: DirtRoadie
On Sep 18, 4:05 pm, Fred <fred.gar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Not that most of us had any question about this before, but it is
> certain now. There shall be no mention of TD as a GT GC contender
> ever again. Never. Got it...
Are you proposing a rule? It would seem to be a self-fulfilling
prediction at this point.
Go here while you can:
http://www.tdcoffee.com/home.php
Anybody know if he has a contract for next year?
DR
== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 10:24 pm
From: Amit Ghosh
On Sep 18, 6:05 pm, Fred <fred.gar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Not that most of us had any question about this before, but it is
> certain now. There shall be no mention of TD as a GT GC contender
> ever again. Never. Got it...
>
> Fred
dumbass,
i cant really hate danielson.
he had the unfortunate luck of being marked as the next big thing, but
most dudes that are the next big thing never live up to their supposed
potential. i can name a hundred of them.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Two different stories from the Vuelta TT
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/7b71a877c8f085d8?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 4:27 pm
From: --D-y
On Sep 18, 3:07 pm, Carl Sundquist <carl.sundqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 18, 11:12 am, --D-y <dustoyev...@mac.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 17, 8:48 pm, Carl Sundquist <carl.sundqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Danielson told VeloNews. "I rode the best time trial I could today. I
> > > had a problem with the zipper on my booty (shoe cover). I felt like I
> > > had a parachute on my foot. I struggled a little on the first part,
> > > but I felt strong on the way back. That's bike racing. It's never as
> > > easy as it looks on TV. I put together the most solid ride I could
> > > today."
>
> > > Conversely, Cavendish finished in 48th place, 3:53 behind Velits
> > > winning time
>
> > > Cav rode 46 km in 56:36
>
> > > That averages out to a 49:53 for 40k
>
> > > For Mark Cavendish, a rider scorned at times for being nothing but a
> > > field sprinter
>
> > > Furthermore it was the 17th stage and Cavendish started 7 minutes
> > > before Cancellara when it was supposedly windier than it was for the
> > > later riders
>
> > > Even after the effort while Farrar finished next to last, more than 6
> > > minutes slower than Cavendish, on the following stage Cav still kicked
> > > everyone's ass.
>
> > "Nothing but a field sprinter". "Scorned". Okaaaay... field sprints
> > are inferior to watching maybe 15 guys huff and puff up the side of a
> > hill at 14mph because... because...
>
> > Milan-San Remo '09 IMHO especially notable for the way he hauled in
> > Haussler and pipped him on the line-- "don't give him time to react",
> > that's the way they taught me. (Of course, they also taught me not to
> > start from so far back <g>)
>
> > I don't get the Taylor Phinney reference but that's OK.
> > --D-y
>
> People discredited MSR as a monument on the logic that if Cav won, it
> was too easy to be worthy of monument status.
There's a long list of big names who have won MSR. Very few "little
guys". Of course, not many "little guys" have won 5 stages in one TdF.
Of course, there's always the Merckx Criticism IRT MSR: "He won it too
often" <g>.
Well, what can I say: Some people might be full of a dislike for a boy
racer who wins sprints with or without his leadout train (ahem), wears
his heart on his sleeve and calls 'em as he sees 'em, including who
the top dog bunch sprinter is, and roundly (rightly, honestly) thanks
his team for getting him to his launch point personally and during
post-race interviews.
"I didn't feel my legs all day" I thought was a memorable quote that
might have ruffled a few feathers.
--D-y
==============================================================================
TOPIC: W H E A T T H I N S ! ! ! ! !
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/2d9122e3da26b995?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 5:58 pm
From: Magilla Gorilla
"Beloved Fred No. 1" wrote:
> Magilla Gorilla wrote:
> > Great question. I live in a bat cave so my electric bill is slightly
> higher than Superman's.
>
> And higher than LANCE's water bill.
>
> > I'm a modern day crime fighter. I'm some kind of fucking super hero.
>
> Did King Kong ever get to tap Fay ?
No, but he got to second base with her on the top of the Empire State
Building.
Magilla
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Lance Armstrong, "I don't recall."
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/49144e36d79c0dfc?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 7:06 pm
From: Jute Andre
.
.
.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31833754/Lance-Armstrong-Testimony
.
.
.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: The Last Word On Cadence And Heart Rate
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/t/9723c0f0dcb01e5b?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Sep 18 2010 7:32 pm
From: Fred on a stick
On 9/18/2010 2:08 PM, A. Dumas wrote:
>
> So what you are saying is, using more meters makes one use less meters.
>
> Well, that wasn't actually a funny observation because I'm sure that is
> exactly how it works, yes. Back in the day I spent a lot of time
> calibrating RPE using PM+HRM on rowing machines and HRM in the boat.
> Later, on the bike, I have always been more comfortable using no
> measuring devices.
Since I have power I get the comfort of not having to use a HRM belt
while still getting useful data. And, of course, if you have power (and
a nicely calibrated sense of RPE) then HR is at best redundant and at
worst misleading.
==============================================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rec.bicycles.racing"
group.
To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing?hl=en
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rec.bicycles.racing+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/subscribe?hl=en
To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com
==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en